{"id":1717,"date":"2018-06-01T11:15:20","date_gmt":"2018-06-01T09:15:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/frjournal.eu\/journal\/?page_id=1717"},"modified":"2021-02-17T15:41:18","modified_gmt":"2021-02-17T14:41:18","slug":"ethical-guidelines","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/frjournal.eu\/journal\/ethical-guidelines\/","title":{"rendered":"Ethical Guidelines"},"content":{"rendered":"
Publisher\u2019s Publication ethics and publication malpractice statement<\/a> <\/strong>(external link to the publisher\u2019s website)<\/p>\n These guidelines are developed in accordance with the COPE Best Practice Guidelines<\/a> for Journal Editors.<\/p>\n The Editor and the Editorial Board are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the Journal shall be published. They take all reasonable steps to ensure the quality of published manuscripts. The Editorial Board is guided by the policies of the Journal\u2019s publisher and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be enforced regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. All manuscripts go through an anti-plagiarism software to make sure that the manuscript going into the peer review are free of an unduly high level of duplication.<\/p>\n Editors must give unbiased consideration to each manuscript submitted for consideration for publication and should judge each on its merits, without regard to race, religion, nationality, sex, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the author(s). All received manuscripts are subject to peer review. Manuscripts submitted for the section, \u201cDialogue with the standard setter\u201d are usually reviewed by the Editor or an Associate Editor (single blind review). The Editor or Associate Editor will make the final decision about publications and assess the need for further revision. They can decide to utilize an expert in the field to make the decision. Research manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant area, according to a double-blind peer review procedure. The reviewers make a scientific assessment and a recommendation to the Editor. An Editor considers the manuscript and the reviewers\u2019 comments before making a final decision either to accept, accept with revision or to reject a manuscript. The peer-review process is confidential; information or correspondence about a manuscript must not be shared with anyone outside of the peer review process.<\/p>\n When the Editor or an Editorial Board member are informed of, or discover, convincing evidence about a problem in a published article (i.e. errors\/inaccuracy, undisclosed conflict of interest, plagiarism), the editorial board will promptly notify the corresponding author and the Publisher and will undertake the necessary actions to clarify the issue and, if necessary, retract the paper or publish an appropriate corrigendum<\/em> or erratum<\/em>.<\/p>\n No fee is required to publish in the Journal, as it is clearly stated on the Journal web site (https:\/\/frjournal.eu\/journal\/aims-and-scope\/<\/a>).<\/p>\nEthical guidelines<\/strong><\/h1>\n
Ethical guidelines for journal editors<\/strong><\/h3>\n