{"id":1656,"date":"2018-02-16T13:12:32","date_gmt":"2018-02-16T12:12:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/frjournal.eu\/journal\/?p=1656"},"modified":"2018-02-16T13:12:32","modified_gmt":"2018-02-16T12:12:32","slug":"accounting-research-production-and-evaluation-the-view-of-the-professionals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/frjournal.eu\/journal\/2018\/02\/16\/accounting-research-production-and-evaluation-the-view-of-the-professionals\/","title":{"rendered":"Accounting research production and evaluation: The view of the professionals"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orazio Vagnozzi \/ Financial Reporting \/ 2-2017<\/p>\n

\n

The existence of a gap between accounting research and accounting practice has been extensively described in literature. In order to be able to publish a research in a high-ranked accounting journal, it seems that methodological issues are more important than those related to the relevance of the topics covered. To improve research and accounting practice and to avoid the risk of accounting research becoming self-referential, every effort should be made to bridge the current gap between research and accounting practice. To this end, the development of mutual knowledge of the agenda of researchers and practitioners on the one hand, and participation in joint projects on the other, could represent possible future solutions to be pursued.<\/p>\n

Accounting profession, Accounting research, Research impact, Impact factor<\/p>\n

\n