{"id":5146,"date":"2023-02-09T22:05:18","date_gmt":"2023-02-09T21:05:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/frjournal.eu\/journal\/?p=5146"},"modified":"2023-02-09T22:27:39","modified_gmt":"2023-02-09T21:27:39","slug":"does-the-adoption-of-planning-and-control-tools-influence-performance-opinions-of-grantors-and-grantees-about-non-profit-projects","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/frjournal.eu\/journal\/2023\/02\/09\/does-the-adoption-of-planning-and-control-tools-influence-performance-opinions-of-grantors-and-grantees-about-non-profit-projects\/","title":{"rendered":"Does the Adoption of Planning and Control Tools Influence Performance? Opinions of Grantors and Grantees About Non-profit Projects"},"content":{"rendered":"

Giacomo Boesso, Fabrizio Cerbioni, Andrea Menini \/ Financial Reporting \/ 2-2022<\/p>\n


\n

This study analyzes whether a positive association exists between foundations\u2019 adoption of accounting control tools and the perceived economic and social perfor- mance. Data are collected through a survey addressed to both decision-makers of Italian banking foundations (IBFs) and grantees that received project-related dona- tions from the same IBFs. Results show a positive association between the adoption of selected planning and control tools (i.e., definition of project budget, in-progress monitoring, and utilization of operating performance indicators) and performance. Meanwhile, a second set of more complex tools (i.e., ex-post valuation of activities, direct operative support offered from foundations to their grantees, and social key performance indicators) records a mixed association with social performance and a negative association with economic performance.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n


\n