About Laura Bini

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Laura Bini has created 31 blog entries.

Is IFRS 9 better than IAS 39 for investors’ decisions? Evidence from the European context at the beginning of the transition year

By | 2020-11-04T17:02:07+01:00 November 4th, 2020|

Mechelli Alessandro, Sforza Vincenzo, Cimini Riccardo / Financial Reporting / 1-2020


The first-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 9 at the beginning of fiscal year 2018 has offered the opportunity to test whether the informationn provided by this new accounting standard on financial instruments is more useful for investors than International Accounting Standard (IAS) 39. This paper assesses and compares the value relevance of book value calculated according to the requirements of the two accounting standards on financial instruments at the beginning of the transition year for a sample of 110 financial entities listed in 20 stock markets that have recorded transition effects between retained earnings. Findings provide evidence that both IAS 39 and IFRS 9 are value relevant and that the second one adds more infromation than that previously supplied by the first one. The paper contributes to the literature by providing the first evidence of the usefulness of the new accounting standard on financial instruments. About its practical implications, the paper provides insights regarding the high quaity of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)’s standard setting process.

IFRS 9, IAS 39, value relevance, European Union, financial entities


Read Article
 0

European Financial Reporting Enforcement: Analysis of Practices and Indices

By | 2020-11-04T16:50:54+01:00 November 4th, 2020|

Johansen Thomas Riise, Olsen Carsten Allerslev, Plenborg Thomas / Financial Reporting / 1-2020


This paper analyses how financial reporting enforcement varies across 17 European countries and the extent to which the enforcement indices used in the existing accounting literature capture this enforcement. Based on survey responses from European enforcement bodies and regulatory specialists, the study finds extensive variations in financial reporting enforcement across the European countries. Furthermore, enforcement indices used in the accounting literature do not appear to capture financial reporting enforcement. These findings should be of interest to ESMA and other enforcement bodies as well as for the use of enforcement indices in accounting research.

financial reporting, financial reporting enforcement, enforcement, regulation


Read Article
 0

A critical approach to BSC studies: State of art, critical issues and future trends

By | 2020-11-04T16:40:08+01:00 November 4th, 2020|

Hristov Ivo, Chirico Antonio / Financial Reporting / 1-2020


The aim of this paper is to identify criticisms of the Balance Scorecard (BSC) and create a new model that is more adequate for business performance, thus providing researchers and practitioners with a way to manage critical issues connected to the BSC. To this end, we devote our attention to two main research questions: (1) What are the main critical dimensions in the existing studies on BSC? (2) How could the structure of the BSC be modified in order to take into account its critical dimensions? Accordingly, we review articles published in 429 journals, in 22 different subject areas of the Chartered Association of Business Schools’ Academic Guide (ABS). We examine a total of 342 papers and obtain 102 relevant papers that focus on criticism of the BSC. Thanks to the information obtained from a survey and interviews conducted with managers of Italian companies, we create and adjusted BSC (ABSC) that allow us to considerate the critical aspects from a new perspective, named the critical perspective. The conceptual model is developd in three dimensions (conceptual, structural and environmental). Research findings suggest that considering the critical perspective makes it possible to build the ABSC, making this management tool more accessible and useful for businesses.

balanced scorecard, performance management, critical perspective, ABSC


Read Article
 0

The information content of Fairness Opinion in M&A: Evidence from Italy

By | 2020-11-12T10:08:50+01:00 November 4th, 2020|

Courteau Lucie / Financial Reporting / 1-2020


One of the major sources of inefficiencies in M&A transactions is the asymmetry of information between the bidder and the target. Several disclosure strategies are used by bidders to convince target shareholders to tender their shares but also to convince their own shareholders about the value of the proposed deal. Target managers also try to communicate to their shareholders their appreciation of the offer. To add credibility to this communication, experts are often called on to express an independent opinion on the offer price, in a document called the Fairness Opinion (FO). While FOs have been found to have no effect on deal efficiency in the US, this study re-examines the issue by considering the actual content of the document, in terms of the valuation process that leads to the expert opinion, in the context of Italian M&As where FOs are mostly voluntary and often provide detailed information about target valuation. The results show that even in a setting where weak enforcement of disclosure regulations allows bidders and targets to choose the level and detail of disclosure, the quality of the content of FO has only a weak association with the performance of the deal, both in terms of bidder announcement returns and of post-deal market and operating performance.

mergers and acquisitions, fairness opinion, firm valuation methods


Read Article
 0

Dialogue with standard setters. Disclosure initiative and related research projects

By | 2019-09-27T10:36:11+01:00 September 27th, 2019|

Fiume Raffaele, Onesti Tiziano, Bianchi Stefano / Financial Reporting / 1-2019


The disclosure in financial statements is one of the pillars of the framework of the International Financial Statements (IFRS). All the standards include a relevant section with indication about the information and data to be disclosed in the notes, however feedbacks received from the stakeholders and users indicated the existence of concerns about the effectiveness of disclosures in financial statements and about the disclosure overload. In order to respond to the above concerns and feedbacks, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) launched the Discosure Initiative in 2013. The Disclosure Initiative is a multi-faced project that involves various IFRSs aiming to limit the disclosure in the financial statements and improving the financial information, it is part of the global project “Better Communication in Financial Reporting” that will be implemented in order to improve the way financial information is prepared by the IFRS entities. The purpose of the following review is to analyse the different stages of the Disclosure Initiative between the four completed phases and the on-going projects and to comment its results.

disclosure initiative, materiality, principles of disclosure, primary financial statements


Read Article
 0

The level of compliance with the Italian Legislative Decree No. 254/2016 and its determinants: Insights from Italy

By | 2019-09-27T10:36:51+01:00 September 27th, 2019|

Cantino Valter, Devalle Alain, Fiandrino Simona, Busso Donatella / Financial Reporting / 1-2019


The present research explores non-financial mandatory disclosure in Italy in light of the recent Italian Legislative Decree No. 254/2016 on “the disclosure of non-financial and diversity information”. The study pursues a twofold aim: first, it seeks to measure the level of compliance of non-financial information (NFI) with non-financial mandatory disclosure; and second, it seeks to identify which determinants favor higher compliance levels in the first year of the regulatory adequacy. To these ends, the study examines the non-financial 2017 statements of 50 listed Italian companies to test by means of a NFI Disclosure Score three determinants that could explain the level of compliance. The NFI Disclosure Score was set at 52.58%. Moreover, findings suggest that the type of reporting channels (stand-alone report or disclosure included in the Annual Report), the Guidelines Reporting Initiative (GRI) options chosen by the companies, and the presence of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee within the board all affect compliance levels. This study is one of the first research conducted on mandatory NFI disclosure providing indications for regulators and companies on how to improve NFI disclosure.

non-financial disclosure, mandatory disclosure, non-financial infromation, Italy, Directive 2014/95/EU


Read Article
 0

The effects of business model regulation on the value relevance of traditional performance measures. Some evidence from UK companies

By | 2019-09-27T10:11:01+01:00 September 27th, 2019|

Simoni Lorenzo, Bini Laura, Giunta Francesco / Financial Reporting / 1-2019


The first case in the world of a mandatory requirement to disclose business model (BM) in the annual report is represented by Companies Act 2013 issued in the UK. The BM offers a simplified representation of a company’s key resources and of how these are combined to create value. For this reason, a systematic communication of BM should affect the way a company’s book value and its capability to generate earnings are perceived. The purpose of this work is to investigate the impact of mandatory BM disclosure on the value relevance of traditional financial measures. Focusing on a sample of UK listed companies over a six-year period, Ohlson model is utlized to assess the value relevance of book value and net income and their interactions with a dummy variable that accounts for the introduction of mandatory disclosure of BM. In line with previous studies on non-financial disclosure regulations, results show that the introduction of the mandatory requirement to disclose BM has a negative moderating effect on book value of equity and a positive moderating effect on net income. As this is the firt study to investigate the effects of a mandatory BM disclosure regime, it could be of interest for both academics and standard-setters.

business model, value relevance, regulation


Read Article
 0

Signing the letter to shareholders: Does the Signatory’s role relate to impression management?

By | 2019-09-27T10:01:10+01:00 September 27th, 2019|

Bozzolan Saverio, Michelon Giovanna, Mattei Marco, Giornetti Andrea / Financial Reporting / 1-2019


In this paper, we syìtudy whether and how impression management in the letter to shareholders (LTS) is affected and related to the role of signatory (i.e. the person whose signature appears in the letter). Specifically, we argue and expect that impression management is associated with the underlying incentives to mislead outsiders that stem from the role of signatory. We find that impression management is more present when Insiders (executives or major shareholders) sign. We also find that the highest level of impression management is when the signatory holds an executive position and is not a major shareholder. Our evidence also suggests that the dichotomous classification between Insiders and Independent Directors is not sufficient to explain cross-sectional variation in impression management.

letter to shareholders, narrative disclosure, impression management, disclosure tone, annual report, executive vs. independent directors


Read Article
 0

The effectivenes of intellectual capital disclosure in market assessments of corporate value creation

By | 2019-09-27T09:51:34+01:00 September 27th, 2019|

Biscotti Anna Maria, D’Amico Eugenio, Vinci Sabato / Financial Reporting / 1-2019


According to literature on the value relevance of intellectual capital (IC), a gap between the market and book value of a company larger than one indicates the contribution of IC resources (mostly off-balance sheet) to the value creation potential of a firm as perceived by investors. In Italy, with the introduction of Legislative Decree no. 32/2007 (by which the EU Directive 2003/51/CE was partially implemented into Italian law), companies are encouraged (for the first time in Italy) to disclse in the management commentary for the fiscla year-end of 2008 and for subsequent years non-financial information about employee matters. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether a more virtuous corporate disclosure behaviour on non-financial IC information relating to the human capital significantly contributes to better explain (more than other IC components) the market-to-book value gap, playing a unique role in the market valuation process of high-tech companies. Moreover, a greater disclosure on IC appears to be determinant in improving the accuracy of market assessment of high-tech companies characterised by higher IC performance.


Read Article
 0

Greetings from the editor: Ten years of personal engagement in Financial Reporting

By | 2019-09-27T09:39:38+01:00 September 27th, 2019|

Quagli Alberto / Financial Reporting / 2-2018


This issue is the last of my editorship. After ten years (2009-2018), Financial Reporting changes editor, from me to Professor Giunta, University of Florence, and I will remain as associate editor of this journal. Let me say a few words on my engagement with this journal, just to keep the memory of our actions alive. We are getting old, you know…
I have served as the editor of Financial Reporting since its creation, founding the journal together with a group of dear colleagues in 2009. At that time, we intended to develop a new room for the scientific debate about the financial communication of companies to markets, investors, and stakeholders. Our aims were to create the first Italian ournal in financial accounting and communication with double blind reviewing process, to launch an annual workshop as a meeting point of our small but lively community, and to overcome some old bad practices of the academic life, where sometimes the name of the author counts more than the content of the paper. We strongly believe in the academia as an open community, collaboration and working groups as a way of life, even if all the public incentives reward essentially the individual and identifiable, contributions. We rapidly began to open the journal to foreign authors with the use of both Italian and English in published articles, and since 2013 we have decided to move to English as official language of the journal to promote the European ambitions of Financial Reporting. In 2011, we favoured the acquisition of the journal by FrancoAngeli, the current publisher, from IFAF. In this ten years, we promoted workshops and seminars together with the IAAER (Venice, 2013), the IASB (London, 2015), and parallel sessions during the annual congresses of AIDEA and SIDREA. We launched the website of the journal in 2012, and have just renewed it this year. FR counts now 10 annual congresses (Pisa, 2010; Firenze, 2011, Napoli Parthenope, 2012;
Roma LUISS e Sapienza, 2013, Verona, 2014; Grenoble, 2015; Genova, 2016; Parma, 2017, Bologna, 2018 and the next scheduled congress in Turin, 2019). We publish a quarterly newsletter and we recently created the promising ENLAAJ (European network of local academic accountancy journals) together with other 10 European academic journals. FR was ranked as a “C journal” in the last VQR (2011-2014), which is one of the best “Italian” journals of our discipline. We have devoted considerable efforts in promoting studies on the Italian context, both in public and
private companies, and we took very seriously the scope of the journal, focused on external communication to markets through financial reporting. Our scope have never included papers on management accounting or inspired by a purely historical perspective. Under my editorship, this journal published 27 issues. We contributed to the diffusion of the culture of reviewing in our Italian academy. The growth of the journal interested some relevant publishing groups such as Taylor & Francis and Wiley, which offered to include it their archives, and I hope that
in the next future Financial Reporting will succeed in including its issues in the most important databases of scientific articles, available in the worldwide academic libraries. Now Financial Reporting has all the conditions to ask for the inclusion in the Scopus list of journals. All the above results to the readers could seem satisfying for a new, greenfield journal. Actually, I do not feel completely satisfied. I am worried for the rush to the A journals. Obviously, you could say, FR is not an A journal, how can I be satisfied? Honestly, my main troubles come from this growing bibliometric trend, in which the venue of publication seems more important than the concepts and theses developed in the papers. Thus, more conceptual approaches – maybe less quantitative but able to open new perspectives – are more and more penalized, not to mention the limited number of studies on national or European contexts compared to those on international or American settings. There is a great need of original ideas, close to the practice, even if not completely mature. I hope that the new editor will see all those things getting better.
I want to thank all assistant editors of these years: Giovanna Michelon, Claudia Gabbioneta, Monica Veneziani, and Michela Cordazzo. FR has seen the growth of their careers along the years. They are all professors. Very
good!
See you around, somewhere; we are living in a small world.


Read Article
 0